Sanlúcar, July 2008
I arrive to the conference in a
somewhat unusual fashion. Let’s say I am
bound to take every possible form of transportation before I can finally get
there. It begins with a quick and
convenient metro ride to the Barajas Airport.
This is where I catch my plane to Jerez.
At the very last minute I notice that the gate I just spent half an hour
walking to has been changed for one at the opposite end of the airport. I start a frantic half-run to get there on
time and take a mental note of the absolute idiocy of the signs that direct
people to the gates. At one point it
reads that I have 9 minutes to get to the gate and no more than three steps
later another sign claims I have 7. They
must have accounted for a brief and unexpected chat with someone or maybe a
quick stop at the bathroom, ¿yo qué
sé? It could as well mean that at
that particular point of the airport they recommended having an on-the-spot caña (beer) to recharge and make
yourself less pissed off you have to walk another 7 minutes just to reach your
gate!
The pace
that I imposed on my already tired legs must have given me away because a guy
with a guitar on his back caught up with me and asked if I was going to Jerez
as well. He also looked disturbed, but
having run out of breath, I could care less for a chit chat in the form of a
friendly discharge of anger, especially that the guy spoke Andaluz, a form of
Spanish I have yet to gain domain over.
Had I known he was going to help me out later on, maybe I would have
made an effort, but instead I just continued walking.
Soon I learned that the next bus to
Sanlúcar was scheduled an hour and a half later, a chunk of time I could not
spare considering it was already 5 p.m. and the conference was starting at
8:30. The only option left (apart from
hitchhiking) was to take a taxi. I had
10 euros left in my wallet - not enough, and the one and only ATM was out of
order. I was trapped and as I walked
trying to make myself calm down, the guitar guy spotted me and asked if I
wanted to share a cab with him. He
seemed very organized. He already knew
there was another girl in the same situation so the three of us hopped in the
cab and ended up paying 5 euros each (that much I did have). Not only that, but also the bus to Sanlúcar
(because the taxi only took us to the bus station) cost a sweet sum of 1.40
euros! Too bad the Andaluz had to leave
for Cádiz right away because it turned out he was a musician and I was secretly
hoping for a private blues concert at the bus station.

The little that I saw of Jerez made
me realize I was no longer in Castilla, more specifically, no longer in
Madrid. The town seemed semi asleep (5
o’clock is technically the end of siesta) with only a few locals occupying
their regular corner bars and some young girls and boys cruising pointlessly on
their vespas. The bus station was mostly
frequented by the borderline alcoholic middle-aged men ("borderline"
because they were still quite alert despite the obvious intoxication) who, at
the sight of two young and apparently foreign girls, could not go on about
their usual business, whatever that might be.
They stared at us with amazement and did not mind being completely overt
about it. Not that it surprised me, but
sadly here it must have been the highlight of their day.
As I watched the landscape during
the ride I suddenly found myself overtaken by its beauty. The endless sunflower fields created an
unprecedented view for me. I wanted to
ask the driver to stop for a moment so that I could take a picture at the very
least. Had I been less tired and not so
pressed with time I could have felt tempted to walk the rest of the way.

Upon entering Sanlúcar I realized
it was much bigger that I had expected and, immediately, I had a feeling it was
not going to be an easy to find the Fundación where the conference was taking
place. It was an extremely good call on
my part to ask the taxi driver how to get there. Out of nowhere he found this older couple
that offered to drop me off. At least
that is what I intuited from the man’s completely incomprehensible
mumbling. I had to have him repeat
everything three times before I could give a response that I hoped worked for
whatever he was trying to convey to me.
It was a curious ride around Sanlúcar in an antiquated car with a couple
taken out of a 50s movie. The town had a
provincial air to it, but it was sprinkled with a few gems and my driver made
sure to point them out to me.
Little did I know of the prize that
was awaiting me at the end of this tiring journey. La Fundación de los Duques Medina Sidonia
stood around the corner from the medieval church the old man presented to me so
proudly. I had no idea what it meant to
be staying overnight under the same roof with the duchess. It means being surrounded by meticulously maintained
and cared for garden with hot pink flowers dripping from the corners of the
chalet. I even spent a few minutes
contemplating that gorgeous tree, but could not prove it was not real. It means walking into hallways and rooms
furnished with wooden antiques and (I am assuming) original paintings, many of
them of religious themes. It means
having breakfast in the presence of several generations of aristocracy glaring
at you from the innumerable well preserved photographs hanging on all the four
walls. As I delighted myself with prime café con leche and una tostada I studied these people’s facial expressions and body
language. The men tended to pose with an
elevated chin and a look that communicated self-confidence while the women
looked stern and somewhat withdrawn next to their tidy children that exhibited
no facial expression.

Staying at the Fundación also means
stumbling across the tiny figure of the duchess herself (as I happened to stay
on the same floor as her) and being unable to leave her as the entire four feet
or so and eighty pounds of her are made up of pure charisma. Every chance she gets she proclaims she is 70
years old as if that was the only reason she can always get her way and as if
the only thing she could ever want is to be left alone when she reaches for yet
another cigarette. She never wastes a
word when speaking; her sentences are sharp and decisive and no one ever thinks
about challenging her. I was stopped
short when I tried to reply to her with something contrary to what she was
saying. She stated that she came
prepared for the dinner wearing a jacket so that she would not catch pneumonia
when smoking out in the balcony. And
then she added that smoking has been proven to prevent the Alzheimer’s
disease. I replied that it still will
affect her respiration. To that, Liliane
replied that Isabel could take me no problem walking up the stairs at the
Tribunal metro station (which has about 5 high escalators that do tend to put
you out of breath). I glanced over at
the feeble, but still full of vitality duchess and though I wanted to doubt it,
I had to agree she would have left me behind be it a race up the stairs or
whatever other race really.

Isabel made quite an impression on
me during Eduardo Subirats’ conference.
Although he was the star that night, one could not deny that the
duchess’ presence and direction over the event made it into a reunion of the
entire town. As I entered the conference
hall two things caught my attention: the number of people and the incredibly
huge painting of, ¡OJO!, a crucified Christ right above where the duchess and
Eduardo were sitting. I thought to
myself: this is too good to be true!
Maybe the local bishop has come as well?
I will explain in a second why I reacted the way I did.
Looking around the audience, there
was a little bit of everything; a potpourri as my landlady here tends to
describe the Malasaña barrio we live in.
You had the devout graying regular church-goers (who, after seeing a
painting of Christ decided they were in the right place) and the typical female
gossip circles with the indispensable colorful fans to occupy their hands and
mind, I suppose. Then there were the
simply curious with their cameras and even notepads. There were also the refined wearing their
finest clothes to a cultural happening.
Finally, there were also the town nobodies that must have heard someone
mention the duchess was throwing something big at the palace and there was free
manzanilla involved as well. This potpourri turned out to be the ideal
audience, nonetheless. Except for a few
isolated shameful moments (a woman asking Eduardo: what about the Asian giant?
Why did he only mention Allah and not the Buddha? Allah was brought up on the margin, as
Eduardo happened to use the word Ojalá, which
in Arabic is an invocation to Allah), they seemed to be genuinely interested
and stayed until the very end.

The duchess set the mood right from
the start by briefly stating her respect and admiration for Eduardo’s
scholarship in the fields of philosophy and literature and by remarking it is a
huge shame his books are not easily accessible.
I suppose Eduardo’s publishers will be getting a letter of complaint
quite soon. As she enumerated the books
that Eduardo published, I got a feeling that, aside from a select few, the rest
of the audience felt lost, but still curious.
From what I noticed, only 4 people fled the scene early, probably
because they had a dinner to attend. The
rest did not dare to leave a mass presided by the duchess herself until the
final blessing (¿manzanilla?). However, it must be noted that a mass it was
not. Eduardo set the record straight
right away by declaring how much he hates conferences composed of a mere
reading of a text. He was solely
prepared to improvise. At that moment I
was so infinitely grateful I had been invited to participate in this
conference. What could be better than
hearing your advisor, professor and mentor speak from the heart in front of a
random combination of people?

He admitted from the beginning that
the story he wants to tell is somewhat autobiographical, but for the purposes
of this exposition, he named his protagonist “Juan Sintierra” after Goytisolo
and Blanco White. The title of the
conference was provocative: “Un pasado sin futuro. Un futuro sin pasado” ("A Past Without
Future. A Future Without Past"). I think, on a personal level, we all have
experienced a similar feeling. I, for
starters, constantly find myself struggling with the past and the future,
constantly trying to reconcile the two.
It was certainly comforting to hear that my professor faces similar
dilemmas.
At a moment when you discover the
bare truth about your homeland and you get faced with all the atrocities that
take place right in front of you, what do you do? Do you run away in search of a better land
and a better reality? Can reality ever
be better? Or do you begin anew with a
more cautious eye? What does take place
without any doubt is that you become agitated, shaken, upset and confused to a
point that, in order to gain distance, you leave. You begin your quest for the truth and there
are many disappointments that surface at that moment. You find out that the human nature takes
pleasure in destruction. It might be a
guilty pleasure, but still a pleasure.
We think that only by destroying we are able to create something
new. Well, the same thing happens in
nature. Take a volcano, for example,
with its unpredictable and life consuming eruptions. As it spills its lava, entire villages,
cultures, civilizations, and vegetation get devoured under its boiling
temperature. However, after that comes
the rebirth. The post volcanic soil
happens to be extremely fertile and the life that gets born on it has an
advantage of growing and blossoming to its fullest potential. This begs the question; if the human race
mimics the nature by wiping out civilizations, does it hope to create something
more developed and more advantageous? Or
does it destroy for pure enjoyment and out of sheer brutality?
The idea of destruction brought
Eduardo to the topic of Colonialism where discoveries meant wiping out whatever
happened to exist in these territories.
All this, of course, was done in a missionary spirit, the grand
conversion. It was far from a natural
way of dying or perishing of civilizations in Latin America, for example. The project guided by the cross had as its goal to erase the past
and the memory and inscribe a new history on this tabula rasa. Salvation was the promise that was supposed
to make it all worthwhile. Have we
managed yet to comprehend the scope of this infinitely cruel and hateful
enterprise?
I glance up at the enormous
painting of the Christ and I feel nauseous about how terribly wrong the people
went about fulfilling God’s plan, granted there was one. The Inquisition, the persecutions, the
missionary escapades… What have we
done? As my friend stated correctly, I
believe, people will always find a way to f*** it all up. We get so inventive with our quests! If we were only this aggressive about
preventing the wrong from happening, maybe we would not have to play the role
of floor sweepers.
Returning to the idea of
destruction, it provoked me to think about self-destruction that seems to be
the illness of this era. Why do people
feel this undeniable lure towards hurting themselves? Is it that we are surrounded and, therefore,
immune to destruction that we take pleasure in creating problems for ourselves
we have to rid ourselves of the past?
What I realized from the story about Juan Sintierra is that you abandon
not into oblivion, but into remembrance.
You learn to acquire distance, but not the kind that makes you no longer
a part of the mess you left behind. You
are bound, at that point, to take responsibility and serve as a visionary to
all the blinded fools that choose comfort over distress and speak only when
being dictated to.
I had a chance to look at two
visionaries sitting side by side and the energy that their presence created
could be felt throughout the conference.
I was completely stunned when later on, at a dinner that I was invited
too as well, a man at the table that introduced himself as a doctor (medical, I
assume) asked the following question: what is the role of philosopher in a
society? I turned my sight to the two
visionaries that sat at the head of the table and I thought that any other
question would not be as impertinent as this one. Philosophers, my dear doctor, and not just
any philosophers, but of the caliber of Eduardo and Isabel are the only truth
tellers in this machinery we call humanity.
If the humanity is to resemble a perfect machine, well then the
philosophers are those that examine the machine from the outside and
demonstrate its flaws. They are the
engineers that overlook this machine and were it not for them we could just as
well call ourselves geese. They are the
very few brave ones with open eyes and ears who simply cannot follow the leader
while everyone else does it with indifference and relief that their brains were
taken off duty.
After the conference everybody
rushed out to the garden for a glass or two (or three) of complimentary
manzanilla. Doña Isabel chooses her
chit-chat circles very carefully. She
stands clear of a circle of women gossipers that shamelessly approach her
asking, "Where to now?" The
duchess barely pays any attention to them and only throws a word on the pass
by, “Home”. That will definitely have
them talking for the next couple of days.
As I get ready to retreat to my chambers (smiley face), I take one last
look around me and cannot help but feel extremely fortunate for having been
part of something as special and extraordinary as this. Although places with breathtaking views and
complex histories can leave a permanent imprint on your soul, it is people that
have the power of changing you forever.
I cannot deny that some change took place in me that night amidst all
these strangers and thanks to the duchess and my advisor. The past and the present suddenly fused into
one and all that came before and after happened now.
A few years after the conference, I learned about the duchess' passing. Her tiny figure suddenly stood in front of me with her inquisitive eyes curiously peering into my soul. That look is what makes me hope that what she saw, what she deduced about me then wasn't disappointing and that it wouldn't be disappointing now either.